| Subject: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
|---|---|
| From: | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:51:19 +1200 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.bash.bug |
Paul Jarc wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Chet Ramey wrote: >> >>> This is from the man page, in the QUOTING section: >> >> No idea about that. GNU project folks are well-known for deprecating man >> pages. I go by the reference manual >> <http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html>. > > That document has the same text: > http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Double-Quotes OK. Though I still think section 9.3 should mention that as a qualification. Perhaps add a sentence like "But see section 3.1.2.3 about the effect of double quotes". |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Variable scoping, Stephane Chazelas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | timeout, Mike |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Chet Ramey |
| Next by Thread: | LC_COLLATE not used for filename expansion, Chris F.A. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |