| Subject: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
|---|---|
| From: | prj@xxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Jarc) |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:30:43 -0400 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.bash.bug |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not going to break any executable scripts, since it has already > been pointed out to me that history expansion doesn't happen in > scripts. History expansion doesn't happen in scripts *by default*, but it can be enabled explicitly. paul |
| Previous by Date: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |