Re: "address@hidden" strings in the web archive

[bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)]

Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Poor Yorick:
> | What's up with all the "address@hidden" strings in the web archives for
> | bug-bash? For example:
> |
> | http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2008-07/msg00063.html
> 
> It is the gnu mailing archive's list way of protecting email address from
> spammers, although it is over-anxious in its regex and ends up treating
> almost anything containing @ as needing protection.  There are other list
> archives out there that do not do quite as much corruption; for example,
> you can read the same message at:
> 
> http://www.nabble.com/forum/Permalink.jtp?root=18519745&post=18527669&page=y

Since Nabble generates very annoying behaviors when used to send
messages[1] let me suggest using Gmane instead.

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/11566

Gmane seems to be one of the better web based mailing list and
newgroup readers out there.

Bob

[1] For example Nabble apparently allows senders to edit their draft
and send a message multiple times with the same message-id!  So we get
several messages sometimes different or sometimes the same but with
the same message-id on all several messages.  Yuck!  It should at
least create a unique message-id for every message.