| Subject: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
|---|---|
| From: | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:27:39 -0400 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.bash.bug |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: Chet Ramey wrote:Yes, this is where the semantics of history expansion clash with traditional shell behavior. Only single quotes inhibit history expansion.In that case, situation number 3 is producing the wrong result, since there are no single quotes there, only a backslash. OK, you got me. Unquoted backslashes inhibit history expansion also. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@xxxxxxxx http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SHELL Bash variable, Eric Blake |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SHELL Bash variable, Pedro Izecksohn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |