Adam Nemet <anemet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Adam Nemet <anemet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> :(. So I don't think we can do better ATM than the current patch at:
>> with the additional improvements of passing the rtx code to
>> mips_mulsidi3_gen_fn and also using the DSPr2 generators there. Do you
Well, I suppose. This isn't what we'd do during stage 1, but since you
gave me a heads-up during stage 1, and submitted the patch a few weeks ago,
let's go with it for 4.5.
> + bool signed_;
OK with that change, thanks.