| Subject: | Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs |
|---|---|
| From: | Steve Kargl |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:36:40 -0700 |
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:20:19PM +0200, Tobias Schlüter wrote: > > Hi > > Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > >Dear Tobi, > > > >>Built and tested on i686-darwin. Ok? > > > >Yes indeed - it's OK by me. This raises the question as to whether we > >should wait for 4.5? I guess that we could cite a virtual regression? > > I've committed the patch (the one from three months agos about wrong > warnings with labels) to 4.5 after running it thorugh the testsuite again. > > Cheers, > - Tobi Thanks! -- Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PING: PR fortran/37746: -fbounds-check for string lengths of dummy arguments, Steve Kargl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix NEAREST for float formats without infinity, Steve Kargl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs, Tobias Schlüter |
| Next by Thread: | Constant expressions etc. patch committed, Joseph S. Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |