|Subject:||Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs|
|Date:||Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:20:19 +0200|
Hi Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Dear Tobi,Built and tested on i686-darwin. Ok?Yes indeed - it's OK by me. This raises the question as to whether we should wait for 4.5? I guess that we could cite a virtual regression?
I've committed the patch (the one from three months agos about wrong warnings with labels) to 4.5 after running it thorugh the testsuite again.
Cheers, - Tobi
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[PATCH] Fix forward propagating of &A[cst], Richard Guenther|
|Next by Date:||Re: [patch][4.5] Make regmove cfglayout-safe, Steven Bosscher|
|Previous by Thread:||[PATCH] Fix forward propagating of &A[cst], Richard Guenther|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs, Steve Kargl|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|