Re: PING^n+1) fwprop merge (ping 6 or 7 by now

[Bernd Schmidt]

Steven Bosscher wrote:

> > These submissions claim to be mostly performance neutral on SPEC, with a
> > slight hit for PPC,
>
> No slight hit on PPC.  I appreciate you reply to my ping, but it would
> have been helpful if you've read Paolo's complete story.  The PPC
> regression was fixed already even before these fwprop patches were
> posted.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only actual numbers for the final patch 
I recall seeing were for ix86.  I asked for more (after all we're 
deleting optimization code here and should make sure there aren't any 
serious regressions), but I don't think anything was ever posted. 
Providing numbers would be more useful than pinging the extra n times.


Bernd