On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:12:01AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:01:25AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2005 22:13, FX Coudert wrote:
> > > >>Like this? I went through diff between my 2005-10-08 patch and current
> > > >>thread-safety patch and updated what I've spotted. I'm not resending
> > > >>the
> > > >>patch because it is huge and hasn't changed too much in the last 2 days
> > > >>(Jannes trans-io.c changes didn't need changes nor the Makefile
> > > >>changes).
> > > >
> > > > OK to commit.
> > >
> > > I do repeat my request that this patch be commited to 4.1 as well
> > I would also like to see this patch in 4.1 ...
> Can I consider this an approvement for gcc-4_1-branch then?
> The patch for 4.1 is identical.
I think the answer should be "yes". Mainline and 4.1 are
essentially identical (except for your big patch). The
longer that we can keep them in-sync, it will be easier
for us to maintain. Of course, a bootstrap and regression
test would be recommended.