| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647 |
|---|---|
| From: | Jakub Jelinek |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:00:16 -0500 |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:28:01PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Can I consider this an approvement for gcc-4_1-branch then?
> > The patch for 4.1 is identical.
>
> I think the answer should be "yes". Mainline and 4.1 are
> essentially identical (except for your big patch). The
> longer that we can keep them in-sync, it will be easier
> for us to maintain. Of course, a bootstrap and regression
> test would be recommended.
Ok, tested and committed to gcc-4_1-branch as well.
Jakub
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ARM fix for big endian linux-elf targets, Sebastian Pop |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | bootstrap broken on darwin with r107347, Andreas Tobler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647), Steve Kargl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Thread-safe libgfortran (PRs fortran/14943 and fortran/21647), David Edelsohn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |