| Subject: | Re: PR22034 |
|---|---|
| From: | Jan Hubicka |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:25:36 +0200 |
> Jan Hubicka <jh@xxxxxxx> writes: > > [...] > > | The decl is _ZTVZ19GetAssertStackTracevE9StackDump (vtable for > | GetAssertStackTrace()::StackDump) whose context is the class itself. > | Why do we emit debug infos for vtables at first place? > > I don't know, but I've certainly done the exercise of debugging > vtables and type_infos in the not too distant past. I would think > theat vtables' context are their classes -- independently of whether > they are defined at local or nonlocal scopes. This is precisely what the code did originally and what leads to ICE as the record_type (class) has no DIE... I am really quite unsure what is proper representation here... Honza > > | I seem to get that probably best thing would be to get the context set > | to the type but we don't produce dies for types at all, right? > > I'm not an expert in that domain -- I know barely enough to follow the > discussions on dwarf mailing list. > > -- Gaby |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix IVOPTs problem, Jeffrey A Law |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PR22034, Mark Mitchell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PR22034, Gabriel Dos Reis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PR22034, Mark Mitchell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |