[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assemble

from [jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

Subject:	[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t
From:	"jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org"
Date:	29 Oct 2008 15:31:13 -0000


------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-29 15:31 -------
The problem is that -fno-toplevel-reorder is often more restrictive than
-fno-unit-at-a-time used to be.  I guess instead of removing the testcase we
should just remove -fno-unit-at-a-time, or add -ftoplevel-reorder.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37339

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at cup dot hp dot com [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at cup dot hp dot com [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org <= [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at gcc dot gnu dot org [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at cup dot hp dot com

Previous by Date:	[Bug middle-end/37951] -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 fails for MA57, dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com
Next by Date:	[Bug c/37947] missing sequence point warning for 'count += inc(&count);', manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Previous by Thread:	[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at cup dot hp dot com
Next by Thread:	[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t, sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]