| Subject: | [Bug middle-end/37150] vectorizer issue |
|---|---|
| From: | "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" |
| Date: | 19 Aug 2008 10:53:44 -0000 |
------- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-19 10:53 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note that the first complete unrolling pass unrolls loops that result in > smaller code. This interferes with vectorization in your case, so can > you try unfortunately, the patch below doesn't apply to trunk anymore. I applied it by hand, and get similar improvements like the ones observed by Tobias. Ifort : 1.54s Gfortran (unpatched) : 3.30s Gfortran (patched) : 1.94s -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug tree-optimization/23094] store ccp, or store copy prop misses an optimization, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug c++/36741] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus "large integer implicitly truncated" passing size_t constant to new, dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug middle-end/37150] vectorizer issue, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug middle-end/37150] vectorizer issue, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |