|
|
Rahul schrieb:
> Michael Thomas wrote:
>> Denis Leroy wrote:
>>> Michael J. Knox wrote:
>>>> Which is what I figured.. fair game for unclaimed submissions.
>>>> However, I would still prefer to see some indication if they are
>>>> reviewing or not.
>>> How do you know if a submission is unclaimed ? It looks like all new
>>> submissions are assigned to Thorsten by default...
>> The user 'bugzilla-sing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>> is the default 'unclaimed' user.
"sink" actually -- that mailbox also has the comment "ignored mailbox"
to indicate that it ignored ;-)
>> Anything assigned to that name is fair game. Maybe we should set up
>> something more obvious, such as 'unassigned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'?
> Copying to DKL to make this happen.
Well, yes, that might be better. But we first should make sure that such
an email address at least exists. So I assume the infrastructure group
or skvidal are those that have to do the first step. Does anyone want to
poke them?
BTW and just FYI: bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx seems to be an interesting
user -- he does not exist, but he did 13 reviews already according to
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=179904,180068,181013,183097,183694,185407,186327,190949,191208,195692,196635,197753,197796
;-)
CU
thl
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|