|
|
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 04:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >abiword:
> > 5: 1:2.4.4-4.fc5 (FE5)
> > 6: 1:2.4.4-2.fc6 (FE6)
> >
> >
> Now that these reports include both FC and FE, shouldnt they be going
> into fedora-maintainers or fedora-devel list instead of in here? Better
> visibility hopefully gets things fixed faster.
Yep, but I'm not sure about what's the best list for visibility.
Perhaps fedora-maintainers is better than here; no docs recommend Extras
contributors to subscribe to fedora-devel and I believe many don't read
it (myself included).
Changing the target or adding additional ones in the script is trivial
and I can take care of it when it's clear where the report is wanted,
but someone who has the rights needs to auto-whitelist/subscribe the
sender (buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to those lists or let me know if
there's another sender that should be used.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|