fedora-extras-list@redhat.com
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: %{_libexecdir}

Subject: Re: %{_libexecdir}
From: Jeremy Katz
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:53:15 -0400
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:40 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd
> > > > say
> > > > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning...
> > >
> > > I'd say take this as official.  libexec is fine, and will continue to be
> > > used.  We need to fix rpmlint to accept it.
> > 
> > On x86_64, should /usr/libexec be 64bits or 32bits?
> 
> Treat it like %{_bindir}

Yep.  Since libexec is basically used for helper binaries that users
don't directly execute

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>