|
|
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:33, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > OK - I'd missed that subtelty, sorry. I suppose that's the best (most
> > consistent) situation that can be hoped for.
>
> Or, follow what koffice in Extras did, and use a meta-package named
> koffice-suite. A nice advantage of this approach is that since the old
> name is no longer being used, we have the opportunity to drop all those
> darn Epoch's from kde packaging.
And break with upstream package name, package name that the current users are
already accustomed, and kdebase and kdelibs should not be sub-packaged, so
they will still have these nasty Epochs. I see no advantages here.
BTW, I had difficulties into installing koffice because of this reason: a
simply yum install koffice didn't work. Then I installed one for one until I
found out koffice-suite exists (dumb me!) :)
>
> -- Rex
--
[]'s
Eitch
http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|