| Subject: | Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE |
|---|---|
| From: | "Jonathan Underwood" |
| Date: | Thu, 11 May 2006 17:05:17 +0100 |
On 11/05/06, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:18 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote: > Do I dare suggest that this might be a place where using an epoch might > be justified? Actually, this would be one of the rare valid cases for epoch. Not very friendly from the user perspective though - how is Joe User supposed to know which epoch refers to which package? Or did I misunderstand the suggestion? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list |
| Previous by Date: | Re: repodata on download.fedora.redhat.com not up to date (and inconsistent), Jose Pedro Oliveira |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | mono / ".pc files in -devel packges" guideline, Chris Weyl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE, Tom 'spot' Callaway |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fedora-music-list] Re: package naming question: muse -vs - MusE, Tom 'spot' Callaway |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |