fedora-extras-list@redhat.com
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: static libs ... again

Subject: Re: static libs ... again
From: Hans de Goede
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:47:58 +0100


Rex Dieter wrote:
I believe this needs more discussion we all seem to agree that static libs should be provided if possible,

???
There have been quite a few dissenters... including my own stance: static libs should in general be omitted, but allowing for exceptions(*)

(*) If there is good reason otherwise, and packager is willing.



Erm,

Big stupid typo-ish mistake: I meant to write (s/provided/avoided/):

I believe this needs more discussion we all seem to agree that static
libs should be avoided if possible,

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>