Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2005-11-05 21:29 EST
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hi Deji, your 1.0.2p1-3 srpm is certainly an improvement but there is still a
> bit more work to do. The main thing that needs to be fixed are the conflicts
> with lam.
Thanks Ed for the review. My understanding previously was that extras package
cannot replace core ones, i.e. there can't be conflict in file names.
While i may be very wrong, i thought in the particular case of mpich and lam
(or/and any other MPI implementation), one cannot have simultaneously install
and use more than one implementation. If more than one is installed in parallel
in a rpm based system, amd their paths properly set in the system environment,
if I run 'mpirun' how would the system know which implementation to use.
I'm not so versed on how to deal with situation like this, any advice and
directions will be appreciated.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
fedora-extras-list mailing list