|
|
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993
------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2005-11-05 21:29 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hi Deji, your 1.0.2p1-3 srpm is certainly an improvement but there is still a
> bit more work to do. The main thing that needs to be fixed are the conflicts
> with lam.
Thanks Ed for the review. My understanding previously was that extras package
cannot replace core ones, i.e. there can't be conflict in file names.
While i may be very wrong, i thought in the particular case of mpich and lam
(or/and any other MPI implementation), one cannot have simultaneously install
and use more than one implementation. If more than one is installed in parallel
in a rpm based system, amd their paths properly set in the system environment,
if I run 'mpirun' how would the system know which implementation to use.
I'm not so versed on how to deal with situation like this, any advice and
directions will be appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|