On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 12:00:23PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> I can not say if it would be better to do the clamav-amavisd integration
> in an own src.rpm, or in the amavisd-new src.rpm.
> But I would prefer when the clamav related data and deps are in a
> separate (sub)package. Packaging should keep dependencies as minimal
> as possible: when non-core functionality has additional non-trivial
> deps, this functionality should go into a separate subpackage.
Packaging amavisd-new seems to be all about getting the dependencies
$ rpm -qp --requires amavisd-new-2.3.2-5.noarch.rpm | wc -l
Adding a couple of extra dependencies to get a fully functional (as
fully as Extras can manage) amavisd-new just seems like a good idea to
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
fedora-extras-list mailing list