| Subject: | Re: ddrescue and dd_rescue |
|---|---|
| From: | Warren Togami |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:07:50 +0200 |
Steven Pritchard wrote: On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:53:25PM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote:I'll just testdrive both packages and we'll see which one is better.The problem is they both have their good points. Personally, I'm starting to think that having both ddrescue and dd_rescue, as well as dd_rhelp (a front-end to dd_rescue that I happen to have a package for) would be good. Since you are familiar with both and also have a supplemental package, does this mean you would like to become the owner? =) Warren -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Request for review: pyxdg, Michael A. Peters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ddrescue and dd_rescue, Warren Togami |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ddrescue and dd_rescue, Steven Pritchard |
| Next by Thread: | build failure, Dennis Gilmore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |