|
|
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 21:00 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 7/27/05, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Treat ruby like perl. If it adds functionality to ruby, then it needs to
> > be in the ruby namespace (ruby-foo), unless it has ruby in its name
> > already. If its an application written in ruby, then it doesn't need to
> > be in the namespace (foo).
>
> For functionality enhancing packages.. do I use perl packaging like
> provides/requires syntax?
Well, I don't think rpm understands ruby(function), and there are no
pre-existant macros that I'm aware of. But otherwise, the perl model
should be sufficient.
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|