|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Florian" == Florian La Roche <laroche@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Fortunately, there are only 4 patches in the 4.0.6 packages, and
>> they all look pretty minor to get working on the new version. Also,
>> there are only currently 5 bugs filed in fc3 with 'xfce' in the
>> subject.
Florian> Have you checked cvs from FC if that wasn't updated already
Florian> to 4.2?
Nope. I hadn't. Looking at it now, it does look like 4.2.0 was indeed
setup in devel. ;)
That means it should be pretty easy to just setup those packages in
fedora-extras, then just add in the new packages.
>> Should we try and merge spec file changes upstream? Things like
>> changelogs are likely not of interest to the upstream packages.
Florian> Yes, improving packaging also upstream can only be good.
Ok. As soon as I can get something in and stable I will look at
feeding changes upstream.
>> Should changelog entries be preserved when moving from
>> core->extras? - From older to newer versions?
Florian> Nice if possible, but not a requirement. E.g. if upstream at
Florian> some point has better spec files, there is no reason to
Florian> continue providing new ones again...
ok. I will preserve all the spec files from core/devel for the
packages that exist in there, and start with new changelogs for the
other ones.
Florian> greetings,
Florian> Florian La Roche
kevin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCJ1zP3imCezTjY0ERAibEAJ9j5YQwZCliy06Z0mhxm6dOl+1e8QCfW+di
HBlhnVVhEZJ5qIKYEWI0PKQ=
=pryw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
|
|