| Subject: | Re: Adding rendered HTML to RPM packaging |
|---|---|
| From: | Tommy Reynolds |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:03:07 -0600 |
Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or > > should we have an additional version? > What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files? "Seems A Shame To Waste Them"(tm) Cheers -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS tag naming conventions, Karsten Wade |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CVS tag naming conventions, Jeff Fearn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |