On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:58:25PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:21:13PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 11/14/2009 07:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:29:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > >> We have just completed our Go / No Go meeting for Fedora 12 and have
> > >> reached the decision to Go. Fedora 12's package set is golden and we're
> > >> ready to stage things for shipping. Great work all around, I'm very
> > >> proud of this release. I'm sure there will be more back patting and
> > >> hand shaking to come, but Will Woods would like to remind everybody that
> > >> it's just 11 weeks until Fedora 13 Alpha freeze!
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hmm.. so I guess this means Fedora 12 will ship with 126.96.36.199 kernel?
> > >
> > > 188.8.131.52 would have had some important Xen PV guest bugfixes:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533730
> > I am sure, we will get kernel updates post-release due to security
> > reasons anyway.
> Yeah.. that I'm aware of. It just means the GA kernel (and thus
> installer) won't boot on Intel Nehalem CPUs.
Judging from the bug report, it will only fail to boot when used over Xen.
Which I believe represents small minority of Fedora users.
Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton
fedora-devel-list mailing list