|
|
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
>> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>> Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>>> altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
>>> breaks?
>>
>> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
>> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
>
> Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken
> dependencies.
I would produce a report before sending any mails. A report suming up the
occurrence of each missing dependency. Eyeballing the top slots of this
list should highlight some obvious things to fix first like the /bin/sh one.
You want to avoid reporting global or near global items on a per package basis.
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
--
Steve Traylen
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
|
|