Re: Broken dependencies script at it again

[Sam Varshavchik]

Tom Lane writes:

> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
> > altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
> > breaks?
>
> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package

Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken 
dependencies.


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list