On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:28 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:20 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb HaÃkel GuÃmar:
> > > This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken,
> > > since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it.
> > > Why i pushed the update on older branches ? Maintainers are asked to
> > > support branches until EOL and it worked on my test VM.
> > > Maybe, i'm just a bit maniacal. ;)
> > Definitely. ;) To "support" does not mean to drown users in useless
> > updates. We had this discussions over and over again, please look for
> > the thread called "The updates firehose" back in June 2007.
> > > Did it break anything ? For the moment, updates are staging in testing,
> > > i can unpush them if you think it's more appropriate. :)
> > In this case I think you really should unpush it. Not only for F-11 but
> > for F-11 as well, possibly F12 to. If this update doesn't fix anything
> > on Linux, then don't push it.
> Then you get bug from people expecting the latest version because you're
> not up to date...
> Come-on this is maintainer decision and as long as it doesn't break
> anyone, leave it that way.
err s/anyone/anything/, sorry
fedora-devel-list mailing list