fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?

Subject: Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?
From: Jonathan Underwood
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:26:25 +0000
2009/10/29 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate
> upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora.
>

IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora then benefits from
the integration and testing work done by the texlive team. The texlive
xdvipdfmx, for example is (I think), ahead of the 0.4 "upstream"
release.

J.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>