|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2009 01:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> But the review of thunderbird-enigmail for Fedora stalled due to various
> reasons for a year or two iirc (bugzilla.redhat.com has some of the
> details; ask remi for all of them
The one I found looked like it was from two years back, and the
xulrunner package was going to change things? I don't claim to
understand the issue fully, but does enigmail still need to be built
inside a full thunderbird source tree or has that been properly factored
out?
- -Bill
- --
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Cell: 603.252.2606
Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833
Email, IM, VOIP: bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkpyTm4ACgkQbZzBxRhdHdswJACgi4Ge4LiR6JTKX4YaaxXN7Y9a
dxQAn2hIezUDerAdwUl9Zuyxvx1YkzXZ
=o5Zv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
|
|