Re: svn or arch

[Enrico Scholz]

walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes:

>> > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number.  I am arguing for its
>> > removal entirely.
>> 
>> How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp()
>> without manual revisions?
>
> Perhaps the spec file could provide a little python function to fix
> upstream versions.

How do you fix '2.6.9-rc1'?


> Or you have an override file.

What is that?


> Or (preferably) you get upstream to name their versions sanely.

Hahaha... that's a good one... I will ask Linus to use sane version
numbers. ;)




Enrico

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list