Re: svn or arch
Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:14:33 +0100
walters@xxxxxxxxxx (Colin Walters) writes:
>> > Yes; but you still have the rpm revision number. I am arguing for its
>> > removal entirely.
>> How will you workaround non-numeric versions which would break rpmvercmp()
>> without manual revisions?
> Perhaps the spec file could provide a little python function to fix
> upstream versions.
How do you fix '2.6.9-rc1'?
> Or you have an override file.
What is that?
> Or (preferably) you get upstream to name their versions sanely.
Hahaha... that's a good one... I will ask Linus to use sane version
fedora-devel-list mailing list