| Subject: | Re: poll: package-specs and version numbers |
|---|---|
| From: | peter@xxxxxxxxx (Peter N. M. Hansteen) |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:51:11 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.openbsd.tech |
Marc Espie <espie@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > With `stronger' specs guarantees, I can add more checks in the > pkg_* code (for package names and for dependency specifications) that > will give out more explicit diagnostics for wrong package names. Sounds like an excellent plan from where I'm sitting. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: memdup(3), Alexey Dobriyan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: memdup(3), Marco Peereboom |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: poll: package-specs and version numbers, Nikolay Sturm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: poll: package-specs and version numbers, Jim Razmus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |