| Subject: | Re: ieee80211_proto.h |
|---|---|
| From: | Jukka Ruohonen <jukka.ruohonen@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:56:15 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.net |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:48:09PM -0500, David Young wrote: > ieee80211_proto.h is probably not meant to be included from userspace. > What are you trying to do? There may be another way. I am working on a small wireless sniffer (i.e. everything is passed directly to userspace via bpf; no libpcap involved). One design solution was to follow the generic ieee80211(4)-framework as closely as is possible. It works very well for this purpose too and I can naturally roll my own functions/macros, but given that I use ieee80211.h-structures, it feels stupid to rewrite something that is already there. So not a problem as such. Can you give any other hints about kernel-only headers in this context? - Jukka R. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ieee80211_proto.h, David Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 link local address generation for P2P interfaces, Matthias Scheler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ieee80211_proto.h, David Young |
| Next by Thread: | VLANs, untagged frames and (i)pf, Edgar Fuß |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |