| Subject: | Re: Rules for adding new network drivers? |
|---|---|
| From: | Stephen Borrill <netbsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:57:13 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.net |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Kaspar Brand wrote: Are there any particular rules when deciding if a new network driver should be added to NetBSD? Specifically, I'm wondering about the et driver (Agere ET1310/ET1301) originally written by Sepherosa Ziehau for DragonFly [1] and ported to OpenBSD by Jonathan Gray [2]. Would this driver be considered for inclusion even when its current vendor (LSI) now dubs it as a "legacy product"? [3] Being obsolete never stopped NetBSD supporting it. Some would say it was quite the opposite! -- Stephen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Rules for adding new network drivers?, Kaspar Brand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: interesting paper at usenix..., Jason Thorpe |
| Previous by Thread: | Rules for adding new network drivers?, Kaspar Brand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rules for adding new network drivers?, Kaspar Brand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |