| Subject: | Re: blocksizes |
|---|---|
| From: | Michael van Elst |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:54:41 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.kern |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:28:07PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:07:03 +0100
> From: Michael van Elst <mlelstv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20100122070702.GA10763@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> | except that there a lot of assumptions that
> | physical block size is the same as DEV_BSIZE.
>
> Is that really true these days?
It is particularly true these days after decades of 512byte-per-sector-only
disks.
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv@xxxxxxxxxx
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: blocksizes, Michael van Elst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: blocksizes, Michael van Elst |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: blocksizes, Robert Elz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: blocksizes, Robert Elz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |