| Subject: | Re: libc warnings/fix |
|---|---|
| From: | "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:31:44 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.kern |
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:41 PM, David Laight <david@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >[1]: http://koowaldah.org/people/ash/netbsd/fix-libc-warnings.patch > Save us by inlining patches that are that short... I don't understand your optimism. 1. some_type *ci; ... ret = get_shared(&ci, ...); How could you guess about usage of the **ci? Indeed get_shared() doesn't care about contains of **rci in some branches. 2. The same behaviour for lookup_mapper_entry() and **variable. 3. Probably compilator regression is occur. I think the gcc is right in 1. and 2. predictions. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPLs - One too many?, Chris Gilbert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Havard Eidnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: libc warnings/fix, David Laight |
| Next by Thread: | Re: libc warnings/fix, Christos Zoulas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |