| Subject: | Re: libc warnings/fix |
|---|---|
| From: | David Laight <david@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:47:10 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.kern |
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:24:47PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20080724074745.GI22423@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I have one more patch [1] to fix three "may be used uninitialized in this > >function" warnings emitted by newer gcc. All three are unlikely to cause > >any problems [obviously], but are perfectly valid from compiler's > >standpoint. > > > >[1]: http://koowaldah.org/people/ash/netbsd/fix-libc-warnings.patch Save us by inlining patches that are that short... > Why? The first two seem like compiler regressions and the compiler should > be able to figure out. The third is more difficult for the compiler to figure > out, so it is acceptable. I guess the first is because the compiler has detected that 'get_shared' doesn't set '*rci' in all paths. Similarly for '*variable' in lookup_mapper_entry. David -- David Laight: david@xxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: libc warnings/fix, Christos Zoulas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Havard Eidnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: libc warnings/fix, Christos Zoulas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: libc warnings/fix, Andy Shevchenko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |