| Subject: | Re: libc warnings/fix |
|---|---|
| From: | christos@xxxxxxxxxx (Christos Zoulas) |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:25:25 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.kern |
In article <20080724074745.GI22423@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, > >I have one more patch [1] to fix three "may be used uninitialized in this >function" warnings emitted by newer gcc. All three are unlikely to cause >any problems [obviously], but are perfectly valid from compiler's >standpoint. > >[1]: http://koowaldah.org/people/ash/netbsd/fix-libc-warnings.patch > Why? The first two seem like compiler regressions and the compiler should be able to figure out. The third is more difficult for the compiler to figure out, so it is acceptable. christos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Ted Lemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: libc warnings/fix, David Laight |
| Previous by Thread: | libc warnings/fix, Alexander Shishkin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: libc warnings/fix, David Laight |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |