| Subject: | Re: __dead functions |
|---|---|
| From: | "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:47:35 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.tech.kern |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 15:48:29 +0200, Rhialto wrote: > On Fri 18 Jul 2008 at 21:10:13 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: > > Actually we can arrange for lint's /* NOTREACHED */ comment to appear > > at the end of that macro so that one macro covers "notreached" > > semantics for all the tools we use. > > That won't actually work, since comments are removed in translation > phase 3 and macros are expanded in translation phase 4, so after the > comments are gone. Then how does all those CONSTCOND lint comments in macros do work? :) Cpp has -CC option for a reason. SY, Uwe -- uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | Zu Grunde kommen http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: __dead functions, Rhialto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cloning devices and DTYPE_MISC, Matthew Mondor |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: __dead functions, Rhialto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: __dead functions, Alexander Shishkin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |