| Subject: | Re: cpu_set_t: what's the equivalent for NetBSD? |
|---|---|
| From: | Christos Zoulas |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:12:43 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.current-users |
On Jan 15, 10:42am, paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Goyette) wrote: -- Subject: Re: cpu_set_t: what's the equivalent for NetBSD? | On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Christos Zoulas wrote: | | > cpuset_t *cmask = cpuset_create(); | > | > cpuset_zero(cmask); | | Man page indicates that cpuset_create() will provide you a "clean" set | to begin with, so it's superfluous to cpuset_zero() it. The code | example in manpage for affinity() supports this. Yes, I was just matching the original code call by call. christos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with msdosfs disklabels and geometry, Steven M. Bellovin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | current-amd64 build breaking in sup/lib, Hisashi T Fujinaka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cpu_set_t: what's the equivalent for NetBSD?, Paul Goyette |
| Next by Thread: | ____semctl50 not defined..., Kurt Schreiner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |