In article <20090115072853.GA16938@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:19:57PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <20090114142752.GA16713@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:03:35PM +0000, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>> >> Effectively, hardcoding a '*version = 1' in _pw_opendb before returning
>> >> makes getpwent work again. So it looks like the version field is not
>> >> being stored in the database properly.
>> >If this is effectively the problem, how does the following look?
>> Looks almost the same with what I have in the branch. But it needs more
>> work to parse both the old and the new version correctly. I forgot to
>> merge my changes. How does it look now?
>I'm in the process of trying it, but after a quick look at the code, you
>don't seem to check the current version of the database. What happens if
>someone runs pwd_mkdb with -u against an old database? I guess you will
>set the version in the file but only update a single record in it, thus
>leaving it inconsistent.
I see, can you merge your changes to fix that then?