On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Scott Balneaves
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:57:31PM -0800, john wrote:
> Well, I think firefox will too. Here's a test: get your 24 students to JUST
> browse around on a site that doesn't involve any Java, or flash. Something
> like wikipedia. I *know*, that they'll be able to do it just fine. Because
> wikipedia pages load, and then they just sit there. Sure, you scroll around,
> but all the processing's mainly done: now you're just scrolling around in a
> This is exactly the same as openoffice. Once it's loaded, it's loaded. You
> scroll around in the doc, but you're not doing anything computationally
Sure, This makes such sense I don't know why I couldn't figure that
out for my self :-( . Thanks for pointing this out.
> Problem is *entirely* flash. Because it just sits there and keeps chewing up
> cycles. Web animations. Ads. Videos. If there's 4 or five flash apps on a
> page (say, 3 flash ads, 1 menu application, and a video), each consuming a
> significant % of the cpu's cycles, *one page from one browser* can peg a
> machine. Now multiply this by the other 23 terminals.
> We've surrendered our web viewing experience to a propriatary app that's
> inefficient. And now we're paying for it.
That's a pretty damning indictment. So is supporting gnash someway the
direction forward in your opinion? Or some other approach?
edubuntu-users mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: