| Subject: | Re: [Ecrit] emergency access and EAP-TLS and denial of serviceattacks on the emergency.com domain |
|---|---|
| From: | Henning Schulzrinne |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:59:21 -0400 |
No, it indicates the desire to place an emergency call. Thus, if I use this access to visit Facebook, I'm doing the equivalent of parking in a handicapped parking spot. The "anonymous" notion would not. Henning On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Doesn't it functionally amount to the same thing, though? Just the client > choosing not to authenticate vs not being able to authenticate? > --Richard > _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ecrit] emergency access and EAP-TLS (and denial of serviceattacks on the emergency.com domain), Dawson, Martin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Ecrit] emergency access and EAP-TLS (and denial of serviceattacks on the emergency.com domain), Richard Barnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ecrit] emergency access and EAP-TLS (and denial of serviceattacks on the emergency.com domain), Richard Barnes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ecrit] emergency access and EAP-TLS (and denial of serviceattacks on the emergency.com domain), Richard Barnes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |