ecrit@ietf.org
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03

Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03
From: "Brian Rosen"
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:43:07 -0500
No Hannes, I am not planning to remove it.

It's something any proxy/calling network/access network needs to know.  It's
"best current practice".

If it's more complicated, we need to add text, not remove it.

Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:35 PM
> To: Brian Rosen
> Cc: 'Dawson, Martin'; 'Cullen Jennings'; 'ECRIT'
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-
> phonebcp-03
> 
> Are you going to remove that text from the document?
> 
> The entire subject is far more complicated....
> 
> Brian Rosen wrote:
> > Yeah, slight reword.
> >
> > An uninitialized device does not have permission to use the access
> and/or
> > calling network but local regulation requires the access and calling
> > networks to grant such permission for the sole purpose of making
> emergency
> > calls.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dawson, Martin [mailto:Martin.Dawson@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:34 AM
> >> To: Cullen Jennings; Brian Rosen
> >> Cc: ECRIT
> >> Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-
> >> phonebcp-03
> >>
> >> Does it actually scan?
> >>
> >> Was the intent to say that the *access network* is required to permit
> >> such a device to have access for the purpose of making emergency calls?
> >>
> >> It reads as if it's the device that has the requirement upon it...
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Monday, 3 December 2007 4:31 PM
> >> To: Brian Rosen
> >> Cc: ECRIT
> >> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice-
> >> draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> An unitialized device does not have permission to use the access
> >>> and/or
> >>> calling network, but is required, by regulation to permit such
> >>> access for
> >>> the sole purpose of making emergency calls.
> >>>
> >> I like that definition. Cullen <with my individual contributor hat on>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ecrit mailing list
> >> Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> ----------------------
> >> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> >> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> >> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> >> immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> >> this email is prohibited.
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >> ----------------------
> >> [mf2]
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>