ecrit@ietf.org
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Ecrit] What is anuninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03

Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is anuninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03
From: "Brian Rosen"
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:37:44 -0500
Doesn't improve things from my point of view.  "Authorization" is slightly 
better in formal terms, but I think that gets confused with mechanisms (crypto, 
...).

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART) [mailto:sgoldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:33 PM
> To: Brian Rosen; Dawson, Martin; Cullen Jennings
> Cc: ECRIT
> Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is anuninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-
> phonebcp-03
> 
> Brian,
> 
> Would the definition be better if "permission" were changed to
> "arrangement"?
> 
> Stuart Goldman
> Alcatel-Lucent
> sgoldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 602 493 8438
> ï please save a tree by not printing this e-mail.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Rosen [mailto:br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:29 AM
> To: 'Dawson, Martin'; 'Cullen Jennings'
> Cc: 'ECRIT'
> Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is anuninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-
> phonebcp-03
> 
> Yeah, slight reword.
> 
> An uninitialized device does not have permission to use the access and/or
> calling network but local regulation requires the access and calling
> networks to grant such permission for the sole purpose of making emergency
> calls.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dawson, Martin [mailto:Martin.Dawson@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:34 AM
> > To: Cullen Jennings; Brian Rosen
> > Cc: ECRIT
> > Subject: RE: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice- draft-ietf-ecrit-
> > phonebcp-03
> >
> > Does it actually scan?
> >
> > Was the intent to say that the *access network* is required to permit
> > such a device to have access for the purpose of making emergency calls?
> >
> > It reads as if it's the device that has the requirement upon it...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, 3 December 2007 4:31 PM
> > To: Brian Rosen
> > Cc: ECRIT
> > Subject: Re: [Ecrit] What is an uninitializeddevice-
> > draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-03
> >
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
> >
> > > An unitialized device does not have permission to use the access
> > > and/or
> > > calling network, but is required, by regulation to permit such
> > > access for
> > > the sole purpose of making emergency calls.
> >
> > I like that definition. Cullen <with my individual contributor hat on>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----------------------
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> > this email is prohibited.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----------------------
> > [mf2]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>