|
|
Then I strongly suggest that you go and re-read your own RFC John.
Altitude can be expressed in floors and this requires a compound
location of both civic and geodetic information in the resultant
PIDF-LO.
or is this a misinterpretation also?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Schnizlein [mailto:jschnizl@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 11:23 PM
> To: Andrew Newton
> Cc: ECRIT
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Profiles (was: Consensus Call) - namespaces
>
> What is "a 3825-like compound location"? My understanding is that
> the XML for location obtained from the mechanism defined in RFC 3825
> is just latitude, longitude and altitude, each with the correct
> number of significant digits.
>
> John
>
> On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Newton wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:53 PM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> >
> >> I've asked a few times, but why would LoST care that the civicAddr
> >> is derived from DHCP as opposed to, say, entered manually?
> >> Obviously, the current profile doesn't convey that information,
> >> either.
> >
> > I don't think it should care. The point wasn't that it came from
> > DHCP, the point was that it was a 3825-like compound location.
> > Sorry if that was confusing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
|
|