Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:26:24 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #443451,
regarding balsa: Links to a GPL library and to OpenSSL
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Jeffrey Stedfast <[email protected]>.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
: Re: Bug#443451: balsa: Links to a GPL library and to OpenSSL]
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:26:24 +0200
I got the following request, could you have a look at it?
----- Forwarded message from Loïc Minier <[email protected]> -----
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:06:45 +0200
From: Loïc Minier <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
clone 443451 -1
severity -1 wishlist
reassign -1 gmime2.2
found -1 2.2.10-1
block 443451 with -1
balsa links against OpenSSL and gmime2.2; it would be nice if gmime2.2
allowed linking to OpenSSL as a special exception.
Do you think gmime could be relicensed in such a way?
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Although balsa allows linking to OpenSSL, libgmime does not and it is
> GPL, not LGPL. So, balsa should not link to both gmime and openssl.
----- End forwarded message -----
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---