[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#239796: marked as forwarded (hpoj: missing parallel support at least

Subject: Bug#239796: marked as forwarded hpoj: missing parallel support at least on sparc
From: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 04:03:05 -0800
Your message dated Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:57:59 +1100
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #239796,
regarding hpoj: missing parallel support at least on sparc
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [email protected]

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 239796-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2004 11:58:15 +0000
>From [email protected] Fri Nov 05 03:58:15 2004
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from cpe-139-168-159-199.nsw.bigpond.net.au (localhost.localdomain) 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CQ2jO-0005Iq-00; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 03:58:14 -0800
Received: from msp by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CQ2jF-0000af-9X; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 22:58:05 +1100
From: Mark Purcell <[email protected]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sparc HPOJ support (was: Bug#239796: is this bug fixed?)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:57:59 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Cc: bear <[email protected]>,
 [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Sender: Mark Purcell <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Hash: SHA1

Hi bear,

No the issue for hpoj parallel support for sparc does not appear to be=20
resolved yet. But this also appears to be an upstream issue with the way hp=
detects parallel support. Unfortunatly there isn't much upstream developmen=
these days :-(

Earlier discussion on this issue is archived at http://bugs.debian.org/2397=

On a side note you shouldn't need to use hpoj for connection of a laserjet =
hpoj is mainly concerned with the HP multi-function devices.  I would sugge=
you have a look at http://linuxprinting.org.


On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:44 pm, bear wrote:
> Package: hpoj
> Version: 0.91-3
> Followup-For: Bug #239796
> I have been assigned to a task to install laserjet1100A printer on
> ultrasparc. is this bug fixed? I have noticed hpoj is still not compiled
> with parallel support. What should I do if I want to help?
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
> Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-sparc64
> Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)
> Versions of packages hpoj depends on:
> ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared
> libraries an ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.2-2    GCC support
> library
> ii  libsnmp5                    5.1.2-6      NET SNMP (Simple Network
> Managemen ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.5-2    The GNU Standard C=
> Library v3 ii  libusb-0.1-4                1:0.1.8-17   Userspace USB
> programming library
> -- no debconf information
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Bug#239796: marked as forwarded (hpoj: missing parallel support at least on sparc), Debian Bug Tracking System <=