[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#283018: marked as forwarded (scanimage: sane_start: Error during dev

Subject: Bug#283018: marked as forwarded scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O on every batch scan
From: Debian Bug Tracking System
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:48:07 -0800
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:30:56 +1100
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #283018,
regarding scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O on every batch scan
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [email protected]

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 283018-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2004 01:31:09 +0000
>From [email protected] Fri Nov 26 17:31:09 2004
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from cpe-144-131-119-234.nsw.bigpond.net.au (localhost.localdomain) 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CXrQb-0005gR-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:31:09 -0800
Received: from msp by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CXrQU-0003p9-Si; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:31:03 +1100
From: Mark Purcell <[email protected]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#283018: would there be any harm in trying an earlier version 
of hpoj?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:30:56 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected],
 [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Sender: Mark Purcell <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:38 am, t takahashi wrote:
> how might I safest go about trying an earler version of hpoj to fix
> this?  Just download it from debian somewhere and try it?
> Thanks.

This maywell be your best option.=20

Have a look at http://snapshot.debian.org.

As I doubt this is a Debian GNU/Linux problem, but rather a upstream hpoj=20
issue, I have forwarded your bug report there in the hope they can help. HP=
haven't been supporting this product under linux much lately, but have a lo=
at http://hpoj.sf.net and try the support forum there.

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Bug#283018: marked as forwarded (scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O on every batch scan), Debian Bug Tracking System <=